Showing posts with label Utopia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Utopia. Show all posts

Friday, May 16, 2014

The Mysterious Case of Betty Blue, Pt. 10.

Need a man, ladies? What size and colour do you want? (Makehuman, Wiki.)

Here are the previous episodes of The Mysterious Case of Betty Blue.



Part 7
Part 8
Part 9


The Mysterious Case of Betty Blue. Pt. 10.

Louis Shalako


At one time Gene and Francine had been as thick as thieves. That was before his promotion and the consequent pull of higher administrative duties. They had gone through a lot of doors together, and while the bond was still strong, as friends they had drifted apart.

The conversation was lagging. She just looked tired more than anything, although there was still a chance she could get home by six-thirty or so.

In which case, why call a babysitter at all? Gene could sympathize, but no real harm done.

“The chief thinks I’m sort of dispensable.” Gene chuckled self-consciously. “It’s like, you’re just sitting there watching the people work. I swear, it was on the tip of his tongue.”

The chief wasn’t exactly known for tact in the department, and all press announcements were carefully crafted. All but the most sensational announcements were made by junior press officers, but every once in a while a hostile journalist asked the wrong question. Pressing a little too hard, a little persistence, and it didn’t take too much to set him off.

“Yeah. I wondered about that.”

“The damned thing is worth millions. What interests me is key words.” He blinked, thinking back to their visit to SimTech. “For one thing, we were presented with three, pretty heavy hitters if I am not mistaken…and then they really didn’t say much, did they.”

Her eyebrows rose, although normally she was the patient sort and a good listener.

“No, seriously. What were their key words? I mean, specifically…that crazy old man.”

“Who? You mean, Doctor Piqua?”

“Yeah—the doctor.”

She stretched out her spine, rising up in the seat. Two more hours to go…

She looked over.

“Well…he said this is their first major malfunction.”

“Uh-huh.”

She stared at Gene.

“So where’s the key word?”

“What if it’s major?”

Francine’s dark eyes glazed slightly and her gaze drifted to the window behind Gene’s profile.

Thin scrub, brightening up nicely with mid-spring temperatures and all the rain, sped by in a blur.

“A major malfunction? What else did he say…in terms of key words.”

“He said it was their first…he said they’re eager to get her back.”

Gene’s voice was soft and far away.

He chewed on his lower lip. A hand came up and stroked the bristles on the chin.

“And that Burch character mentioned public safety and liabilities.”

“I suppose I can see their point. I mean, they must have all the usual problems with anything computer-based these days. Constant upgrades to beat the constant attempts at hacking…the constant bombardment of cyber-attacks from overseas…bugs, glitches, viruses, and then there were all those recalls of the early household models.”

“No doubt they had to be careful what they say.”

“Yes.” The trouble was they did say it, and they weren’t real shy about it, either.

He thought about that for a while: stating the obvious.

His earpiece vibrated.

Francine was drifting off, sagging further in the seat and with her chin lowering perceptibly by the second.

Gene touched the tit on the side of his phone.

“Hello.”

He kept his voice low. A nap on company time might do her a bit of good.

Gene wasn’t wearing the Googs as he wanted to relax. They were away from work and in an unfamiliar environment. Just this once, there was time to think. This was often conducive to some kind of inspiration, although there was little sign of it yet.

“Who is this, please?”

“This is Patrol Sergeant Parsons. Thirty-Eighth.”

Gene’s voice picked up in volume.

“Yes.”

He sat up a little straighter, reaching for his briefcase and his notepad.

“We have a sighting of Mister Scott Nettles. He took a taxi, and it’s only about three k from where our mystery couple disappeared.”

Francine made a sound Gene associated with sleep apnea and her chin bobbed up and down.

Her eyes opened, and she looked up in apparent confusion.

“Hold on, please.” He nodded at Francine. “We’ve had another sighting of Mister Nettles.”

She nodded, sitting up and mouth working.

To no one’s surprise, she looked at her watch and uttered a deep sigh.

***

Hopefully by 2025, we will have adapted 1980s technology. (Mx kouhosei.)
Images appeared on Gene’s large tablet.

“Mister Scott Nettles.” Gene and Francine took a good look at the man in the back of the taxi. The sound came up and then they heard the machine ask for a destination.

Their jaws dropped when Nettles gave a series of coordinates.

“What?” Francine was alert now.

“It’s okay. It’s just GPS. We’ve located that, and it’s only about sixteen k’s up the road. They, or I should say he, headed almost due west from the rave party.”

The interesting thing was that it wasn’t an address in the conventional sense. Why not just say drop me at the Seven-Eleven on Twenty-Seven Mile Road? Whatever. It meant something special.

Gene just didn’t know what.

Point A to Point B. Nettles got out of the car at an intersection. As soon as the car moved on, he went out of the field of view of the rear-view camera. The car had turned left to make another pickup.

“That’s it?” Gene’s voice rose slightly in dismay.

“There were no live cameras at the intersection at the time. There still aren’t, incidentally. Those ones have been out for a while.” Parson’s dry voice came after he cleared his throat. “Our subjects have been having some pretty good luck with that.”

At this stage of the game, Gene wondered if there was any real significance in Mister Nettles movements.

“What’s important here is that they’re not together.”

Parsons nodded.

“There’s another thing, Inspector.”

“What’s that?”

“The probability has dropped on our identification.”

Gene studied the readout as Francine tried to find it on her own device. Like Gene, she’d taken the Googs off and was reluctant to put them back on as they (or something) had been giving her migraines lately.

“Sixty-seven percent.”

“What do you mean?”

“Huh! This guy hasn’t been seen in years, literally years, without the ball cap. He left the house without his dark glasses exactly two days in a row, eight and a half or so years ago. That was the end of February, and he must have replaced them—broken, probably, on cheque day.”

To the blind, it was part of the uniform. It made people aware of them, and drivers needed to see the stick and the dark glasses. It made things easier for those around the blind. While the stick was practical, the white colour and the dark glasses were universal symbols.

Parsons went on to explain that every person’s behaviour generated a digital fingerprint. While the Nettles profile was a little sketchier than most, a regular assortment of passive sightings and archived recordings indicated that he lived his life, all of it, within a radius of less than a kilometre and a half.

He was out of his usual neighbourhood, and therefore out of character. It was akin to a person in medieval times, living barely at subsistence level, with the whole family working six and a half days a week, picking beans and dragging a plow behind an oxen, and then suddenly taking a vacation at the beach.

There must be a reason for his behaviour.

Gene nodded and Francine said nothing.

The train whistled along, perceptibly bumpier now, and there were voices in the hall running along outside their compartment. Life went on all around them.

“So, who was the lady in the park, ah; is this the same guy, and why is he alone now?”

“Yes, sir.”

Francine made a noise which Gene interpreted as agreement.

He gave her a look. She shrugged.

“It does appear to be the same man.” That was as far as she was prepared to go.

“So.”

“That’s the real problem, Inspector. The really neat thing about Mister Nettles is how he seems to appear and disappear. He came out of the rave. He did change his appearance...no hat, no glasses. But. Did he go in? No record of that. He gets in the car. He gets out of the car. Then he disappears, completely off the radar for the last day and a half so far…”

Gene nodded firmly.

“Okay. I see your point.”

A day and a half was a long time. At home, in his apartment, that was one thing. But out in the world, that was another.

“Okay, Sergeant. I’ll have someone interview the landlady at the Nettles address. I’ll have them share any information that they get there with you.”

“Ah, thank you.” Parsons still had a series of assaults on the books.

His mouth curled a bit and Gene grinned and nodded. The punks would forget about it soon enough, but Parsons obviously sensed an opportunity.

“And, uh, we’ll keep working on this.”

“Yes, sir.”

Gene sat back and hit the icon. Parsons was gone again, although his inbox was lit up with something additional from the sergeant.

His head twisted and he took in Francine with a glance.

She nodded.

“I’ve got a good feeling about this one.”

***

No camera means that you are invisible.
“Okay, Scott. Bingo. There’s the doorman, right in front of you. Three feet.”

He spoke up right on cue.

“Excuse me. Is this the Red Dog Saloon?”

“Ah, yes, Ma’am. It sure is. What can I help you with?”

Scott stood there, wavering a bit to and fro. His hippie glasses dangled languidly from his left hand.

“It’s just that I’m blind with these contacts. I’m waiting for my date.” 

Betty had applied the makeup, and he had a wig and a hand-clutch type purse. “Nick will be along soon…I hope.”

He positively tottered there on what she said was black patent leather pumps. There were low voices all around and yet he had avoided stepping on anyone. It took fierce concentration to rule one’s emotions. Someone nearby giggled. He hoped they were taking a good look. Time hung heavy, and his pulse was still racing. He struggled to keep his breath calm and smooth, blanking out a little and just going with it. A cheap buzz, he thought.

That’s what I need right about now: an anxiety attack…he gulped and tried to sort of purge the CO2 from his system.

That’s what it was. It wasn’t the lack of oxygen that killed you, it was the CO2. It was a good thing he had the purse to hang onto. A revealing insight about women. They at least had something to do with their hands when they got a little nervous.

Listening to the chat about him settled him down. No one had accosted him, no had remarked upon him. 

They were just ignoring him, and he tried to locate them by sound as best he could.

This was said to be the biggest bar in the state, a real turnpike-style roadhouse, away from the city and its satellites, and set in an unincorporated township. It was open 24-7 with continuous live entertainment of an eclectic nature.

The dress, a little shorter on him than it would be on Betty, would be ruined by the huge globs of sweat running down from Scott’s unshaven armpits.

His girdle was killing him. It wasn’t so much about passing as a woman. It was about passing for anyone, anything other than what he was.

“Here I am, Lover.”

Betty and Scott engaged in a quick peck, Scott enjoying the fact that there was a small crowd hanging about the entrance. The irony of it all.

“Where did you park?”

“Oh, I found a good spot.”

It was a short speech, well-rehearsed, strictly for public consumption, and it was soon over.

Scott nodded approvingly. They’d actually walked the last three kilometres, with Betty hanging back around the corner and Scott being talked into position, over the last few yards, through the earpiece. This was all for the eye-witnesses. All of this to get a hot meal and a drink. Scott also wanted a bed for the night something awful. A bed and a bath. Hopefully she had hidden the bags well enough.

Betty had chopped her hair into something more resembling a page-boy cut, and was clad, according to her amused description, in a charcoal-grey zoot suit, very androgynous as she put it.

They held hands as a couple ahead of them murmured with the doorman. They were admitted, a blast of real sow-belly music coming out the door as they went in. She gave a quick pull and Scott stepped forward hesitantly.

Another strong hand grabbed his right elbow and gently steered him into position.

“You guys are next. You’re lucky, it’s not so busy tonight.” Apparently, the bouncer was talking to him.

Betty’s deep basso-profundo voice, put on especially for this occasion, thanked him gravely.

Scott had been thinking about all of those cameras.

If you couldn’t get away from them…then maybe you might as well join them.

...or something like that...
Or something like that, but he’d heard of privacy freaks buying expensive masks and wearing them in any public place they went. It seemed a bit much to him at the time, hearing about it on the TV, but he could appreciate the point now.

The smell of food, real food, wafting out from the saloon, more of a head-banger, speed-metal, family-style bar and grille by the sounds of it, was driving him nuts.

Which was more of a short putt, as someone had once said.



END




Oh, look, ladies and gentlemen. Louis has all kinds of good books here on Chapters/Indigo.








Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Independent Publishing: Utopia or dystopia?







































(Hieronymus Bosch.)


As a science fiction writer, I have to ask the question, is the rise of independent digital publishing dystopian? Or is it Utopian to have the freedom to publish a book?

It depends who you ask, doesn’t it? There are those who see the democratization of publishing in dystopian terms. It is the end of the world, and a cloud descends over humanity. Others, including myself, see it as a vast and wonderful opportunity to transcend hierarchical structures and establish our own meritocracy of abilities.

Not everyone has the ability to write, so there is inequity here as well, although this is true for traditional as well as self-publishing.

What makes dystopia or Utopia is interest. It depends which side you are on. One man’s Utopia might be authoritarian. He would finally have the power and control to rectify the world’s wrongs, and confine or reform those who did not meet social standards. Sounds good, eh? Unless you don’t live up to expectations. His personal Utopia includes tyranny over you.

And yet the opposite, a state where there was no authority, and the needs of all (or the greatest number,) were still somehow met, might seem very dystopian to those who believe that there is nothing good which does not stem from some higher power or authority somewhere—they might be Utopian in that they seek a benevolent world government. They might have all kinds of logical justification. They would be up on a pulpit and no one would listen. That might be very frustrating.

What if all they want to do is to organize things constructively? You can’t get anything done, in an anarchic dystopia. That’s for sure.

What if they want to tell you what you can and cannot read? Surely there is some of this behind all the angst from authority figures in this industry. They're just not giong to come out and say it on record; what you can and cannot read. That would reveal them in all of their splendour, wouldn't it?

A woman’s Utopia, or dystopia, often looks far different than that of males.

So many issues of social control or progress, or reform, revolve around our bodies, from what we can eat, or what we can do on a given day of the week, fish on Friday or whatever, and of course all the reproductive and moral guidelines. Then there is the battle for our loyalties, our hearts and our minds. It’s all over the place. Surely someone has an interest there. Society has an interest—if an ‘inanimate idea’ can be said to have an interest. Society is a necessary fiction. Society is a generally agreed-upon thing. It is the thin veneer that covers barbarism.

To throw all that away could be seen as dystopian or Utopian. It depends on your point of view.

People’s arguments don’t always make sense. Yet they can be very sincere.

Here is the Utopian disconnect: one man’s Utopia involves getting rid of every law. Every law. He drives as fast as he wants on the highway, drinking beer, setting fire to the homes of people he doesn’t like and having sex with farm animals. He’s in paradise. The rest of the world is endangered or even just offended. So many social sanctions depend on public opinion. What else is there to judge by?

Another person’s Utopia is one where everyone behaves rationally and with perfect decorum. How could it be achieved, without massive social intervention, or even a eugenics program?

Another person’s Utopia would involve perfect social control through the use of legal sanctions. There would be a law for every eventuality, and laws for scenarios as yet unimaginable. They would cover all the bases. Who pays for the court system? Who wants to be taxed to support the masses of humanity serving time and paying their debt to society in a jailhouse?

One person’s Utopia might be to impose a belief on another. Not to be able to impose social control, or morality, could be considered dystopian. Perfect personal freedom might lead to dystopia. Surely efforts to band together to avoid anarchy, to provide social services, would tend to promote one group of interests ahead of others. How does that play out over the long run? Wouldn’t that lead to another elite? We admire elites. We look up to them for all kinds of reasons. Or would we all sit around doing nothing? Where none may rule, who is to say otherwise? What right do they have to enforce it?

Public opinion has never stopped evil from doing what it will or good from doing what it must.

What sounds like Utopia, a world where everyone just accepted everyone else, and then went ahead and did what they had to do, what was right for them, probably isn’t an achievable dream anytime soon. That’s because it looks too much like dystopia to the average bear in the street. And you can’t legislate or impose enlightenment on those who will not have it.

I’ve got that much figured out.

Is the new world of digital publishing Utopian or dystopian?

It is both. It represents change. One person’s disaster is another person’s opportunity. There are two schools of thought on the industry today, divided along almost partisan lines. It is that tension that prevents either Utopia or dystopia from actually happening.

***

So what qualifies me to be a writer?

Nothing, really. And everything.

I say that because after some thought, I realized that I’ve had nineteen cars in my lifetime. I’ve lived in five different places, including big cities and remote locations. I’ve had at least thirteen addresses that I can remember. This includes houses, apartments, boarding houses, and even a motel room with a kitchenette.

I’ve had easily fifty jobs, some of which were service or construction jobs, where we went to all the different plants and businesses in the tri-county area. I’ve worked in a hundred cities, towns and villages, and on farms as well.

I attended five different schools, took something on the order of forty different classes, (including bluegrass guitar,) and I’ve had five decades to sort of figure things out. I’ve been around the block once or twice.

I’ve read a lot of books, seen a lot of films, and listened to a lot of music. I’ve looked at a lot of art, listened to a lot of people and lived my life. I’ve had a few girlfriends, drank a lot of beer and had a lot of fun.

I’ve known a lot of people, and heard quite a bit about people I don’t really know all that well. Some of them, I don’t care to meet.

I’ve done a lot of things. I’ve been to two other countries and a couple of different states, although as far as Canada goes, I’ve never been anywhere else but Ontario. Mind you, Ontario is a pretty big place.

I’m fairly intelligent, a good worker, and exhibit some imagination. I’m logical, and reasonable, and just a joy to watch in operation. I also have the ability to write. I have plenty of free time, a good dose of patience and rarely lose my sense of proportion. I’m a pretty good guy, all things considered.

I take things day by day and I like to laugh a lot.

If we’re not having fun, then it’s just not worth doing anymore.














Sunday, April 15, 2012

Utopia 101: When all books were created equally well.

What if we lived in Utopia? What if every book in the marketplace was a great book? What if, the editorial gate-keeping process ensured that every book regardless of genre, whether it was fiction or non-fiction, self-help or sheer escapism, met all the critical criteria of ‘a great book?’ What if no one who bought one felt ripped off, or disappointed, or let down in any way? What if nice, safe profit margins were just assigned to publishers, and so they could even take a few risks, and publish books they loved but thought maybe wouldn’t sell too well?

Is it even possible? What makes a great book on diamond cutting might not be too interesting to some readers. Reading Tolkien might not be very suitable for an apprentice diamond cutter who just wants to learn his trade. It would be useless. Surely, we would have the wit to choose our own book purchases from a long list of titles in every category imaginable.

It seems evident that in a world where all books were somehow created equally well, none could really stand out above the crowd, yet genre-preferences would enable some to enjoy greater financial success than other, equally good books. There are far fewer readers who actually want to read a book on diamond cutting. Lots of people want to read fiction, including fantasies like ‘The Hobbit.’ Would it be necessary to review books, or couldn’t we just stick our hand in a bin labeled ‘fantasy,’ and pull out something equally good, every time, on the very first try? How would all equally good books be priced? Shouldn’t all hard cover titles cost the same, and wouldn’t all trade books in a certain size be the same price? It’s only fair, right? They’re all ‘equally-good,’ right? Ebooks, where there are no material costs, would be equally priced—and cut right to the bone…right?

(Would this impair or promote ‘competition?’ Amongst whom, the publishers, or the writers?) *

If every aspiring writer had to compete in the big leagues, going up against Jonathan Swift or ‘Doctor Zhivago,’ or ‘War and Peace’ their first time up to the plate, or if any brand-new non-fiction writer had to go up against ‘The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich,’ or maybe Winston Churchill, how would they do? You would be up against people who had first-hand knowledge and had lived the story.

They’d probably strike out, three times in a row, and they’d never get another ‘at-bat’ until hell froze over. That’s because there is a ‘glut’ of aspiring writers. The majority have little or no training, just a desire. In some cases, there is the desire to learn, in some perhaps not. We also have no experience. None. Not until we’ve done it a few times. It’s not enough to serve in the trenches to pay our dues. We have to go ‘over the top’ once or twice, taking the battle into the enemy’s camp. Only then do we know what it’s all about.

The good news is that all the rules of the game changed recently due to the rise of a newer technology, and new methods of publishing our work. We don’t have to take on Tolstoy or Voltaire our first time up to the plate. We don’t have to pursue agents and publishers for fifteen years or more until we get noticed. While some would argue that Amazon is itself a kind of vanity publishing, we can avoid the traditional vanity predators that still dot the landscape. Hey! We don’t even have to spend money on postage, ink and envelopes. This will not make things any easier. It’s just different from the way it was before. The playing field has been leveled and it is a sea of anonymous, hungry, and unwashed faces. The towers that dot the landscape are now isolated, cut of from water and sources of supply, and heavily outnumbered. They cannot withstand long years of siege.

There has always been independent publishing. Take a pdf on a CD and go to a local printer. Get an estimate. Get some books printed. There has always been vanity publishing. Take a CD and go to a vanity publisher. Hand them the file and a cheque. If this was the extent of the business plan, it generally failed. The difference is that now it is easy, and it is also free. The game is open to anyone who fancies themselves as a writer. Now, my plan involves slow but steady growth over the long term. It’s not glamorous, and it’s not going to make any headlines, but to rely on an instant bestseller is infantile.

The world of business, mean and arbitrary, Darwinian as it is, evolves constantly. We either evolve with it, or we will be consumed by it. Over the short term, I just need to learn my new environment, to discover and adapt its resources to my needs.

For those with the right attitude, this represents the opportunity of a lifetime. For others, it represents a big survival challenge. If competition improves the breed, then we must assume the survivors, better yet, those who thrive, to be the fittest, the smartest and the fastest when it comes to meeting those challenges. They will be those with adaptable skills and staying power. They will endure. One of their challenges is the writing of a good book. It goes with the territory.

It looks like those authors who learned their trade by the old model might still have some advantages. This is only true in the short term. They have a following, an audience. But they also have to learn a few new tricks, or they simply won’t survive. They might have to forgo the safety net that a major publisher has always provided. This was something that aspiring writers always prayed for. An agent. An editor. A proofreader and a typesetter, and a cover designer, a few good marketing and promotions people. Some of this old infrastructure will have to adapt, or perish.

We will have to learn the basics of promotion, in a new, online environment. Independents will have to look, for the most part, to the readers for their validation. In an industry which is in some small part fueled by vanity—hence all the vanity predators—there must also be some massive insecurities. This sometimes manifests itself in a sense of moral outrage. To think that some anonymous, hungry and unwashed person would engage in that most anti-social of all activities, the writing of a book, and try to compete with the big boys…well, it’s just wrong. And all the wrong sort of people want to do it. The book is the most revolutionary tool I can think of in terms of human evolution. Hell, even business evolution. I guess you could say they just don’t like it. They don’t want to be our colleagues, and maybe they don’t have to.

It is a free country, after all, or about the closest we have ever come to Utopia.

Please feel free to contribute a comment or observation to this piece.

*Does war impair, or promote, commerce? If you can answer this question, you are a hell of a lot smarter than I am. Anyway, you probably just got it out of some classic and well-regarded old book, written by some brash young feller who was considered a ‘radical’ for his time and place.