Louis Shalako
Much has been written about passive discoverability
for books.
The same theories would
hold for other products.
The basic premise is that a good product will sell,
even without promotion. Sooner or later, if you publish a book, and make it
available in as many venues as possible, it will sell one copy.
That would be the first copy on any given platform.
Selling that first copy easily doubles the chances
of selling the second copy. Without selling a single copy, your book has no
ranking at all on Amazon. When I sell one copy in a given category, my ranking
might be, as I saw recently, #116,567 in the overall sales rankings, in (or on)
Amazon. That would be book sales and not lawn mowers or sheepskin coats.
Rankings are by category.
The trouble with promotion is that it can be spam,
and it can simply go on too long. It can be over-projected at too small an
audience, who quickly tire of it because they’ve seen it fifty times. Other
more active forms of promotion, such as a newsletter, are labour-intensive, as
a newsletter requires actual news, content, games, contests, all kinds of stuff
can go in a newsletter.
How big is your email list? Mine is composed
exclusively of magazine and book editors, a half a dozen writers, (maybe,) and
my sister and my mother, maybe an aunt or two. It’s not a big list, and why in
the hell anyone would want to be bombarded by a constant stream of news by some
unknown guy is a mystery.
How does passive discoverability actually work?
If someone is browsing in a genre, and you have a
book in that genre, if they keep looking long enough, your book will be
presented to them, based on its numerical ranking. It might take days or weeks
of browsing, but it will eventually show up.
Ah, but retailers like Amazon also know their
customers as individuals. They have their previous browsing and purchase
history, which is used to tune that product-presentation algorithm we keep
hearing about. If your book is in a genre they like, the odds increase for that
customer and your book to come together.
This is why giveaways are so important. Someone who
has taken a free copy of your book is much more likely to be presented with
another one of your books, one with a price on it, the next time they come back
to the store, or at some point in their future browsing.
It’s almost too easy to set a price for free on
Smashwords, and let the book get down through all the distribution channels. At
some point, a free book, in this example a new release, will be ‘purchased’ on
another distribution platform. Smashwords added Baker-Taylor Blio, for example.
Very few of my older titles have gone out the door,
even something set at perma-free. When Smashwords (somehow) sent them 200,000
titles, there was no way what was mostly backlist, would show up in the ‘just
released’ stream that all book-selling websites have. They were merely added to
the catalog. The new releases are on the front page of the website, where searches
will land prospective customers. It’s a good place to be, right?
Want some customer to ‘discover’ you? And your
backlist? Publish something new. It must show up in that new releases stream.
And if they look at your book and then click on your name, then they will see
your backlist on that website.
I bring this up, because on those sites—unless you
actively promote each and every title in your backlist, for each and every
site—Kobo, iTunes, Diesel Books, etc.—then those books must be relying solely
on passive discoverability.
What this (I guess) represents is an experiment of
sorts.
How long will it take for the first unit to sell, on
a new platform, whether it’s a catalog-addition (say my backlist title Heaven
Is Too Far Away, the first book I ever published in Sept. 2010) or a new
release?
That depends on the number of people using that
site, i.e. store traffic, the length of the store’s list, category-by-category,
and other factors of desirability,
such as the cover. Some genres are more popular and there is the product
description, and then there is price.
A whole bunch of factors go into the decision to buy
a book, and outside factors such as the economy, or a customer’s employment
status, (or what sort of mood they’re in,) all beyond our control, also play a
role.
I’ve found it pretty easy to use the system
unthinkingly. For example, on Smashwords, I set up a story for free, and then
basically just forgot about it. That book might fly out the door at first, but
after a while, the ‘sales’ of that free book drop off markedly. If I was going
to set a price on that book, the best time to do it might have been while it
was still hot. The trouble with that one is that it’s the first one in a
series. I could set a price on it and try and make a few sales, and set another
one in the series at a promotional price. That takes thinking, planning, and
hands-on running of the publishing machine.
Everything I say about algorithms is pure
speculation, but some authors have reported a ‘bump’ in sales after using Kindle
Select. It works far better if you have given away 10,000 copies of a book in
one day as opposed to a guy like me giving away forty copies a month for a
couple of months, or even years at a time.
That’s what they mean when they say
‘velocity.’
That book is going out faster than mine—it has more velocity. In future browses, no matter
who it is, more people are likely
have that book in their history than mine—that author’s next book will be more likely
to be presented to them than mine.
I have noticed, if you slow down and stop publishing
new titles, (say the Louis Shalako books) the older titles can drop right off.
If you never promote, your titles will fall to some natural level, and this is
the land of pure discoverability. Someone’s really going to have to love books
or feel that they simply must have a dig in the crypt!
But it’s tough sometimes to sell maybe three copies
of a new book and then watch it slowly plummet into infinity. This is the
single biggest reason why everyone wants to promote.
It’s a natural and compelling urge.
I say that because at the rate new books are being
added, the sales rankings will quickly involve, in the next five or ten years,
fifty million titles.
It could go to a hundred million pretty damned
quick.
An American or a Canadian author (or publishing
house) might quickly lose interest if all they’re making from a long list of
books is thirty or forty bucks a month. That might represent real money to
someone subsisting in another part of the world, and we all find the notion
that we might somehow get lucky and strike it rich pretty insidious. I’m sure
they feel the same way.
The competition will only get fiercer, ladies and
gentlemen.
So, four years after getting Heaven
Is Too Far Away into the iTunes store, I sold my first copy of the
book, at $5.99, which results in a pretty good royalty after retailer and
Smashwords’ cut.
Selling that first book on iTunes more than doubles
the chances of selling a second book. Redemption: an Inspector Gilles Maintenon
mystery has a ranking on iTunes. That took years. In the last four years I
probably did ‘promote’ those books by tweeting out an iTunes link or something,
but that particular sale of Heaven Is Too Far Away, is almost certainly by
passive discoverability.
Unless the
customer somehow knew my name, knew the title of the book, or searched some key
word like Red Baron, or WW I, or some other key word in the metadata for the
book.
A combination of factors, including the cover, the
blurb, the preview, key words in metadata, the number of customers in the iTunes
store, the genre, it somehow all came together to sell one single copy of that
book in that particular store, on that particular day.
The other thing is simple popularity of the genre. Parody
WW I memoirs are only going to interest so many people, whereas the latest
horror novel by the King of the horror genre will interest a lot more folks.
There’s not much I can do about that except write
some horror and get in there and compete.
(Horror's not my thing, so that's kind of an empty threat.)
END
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please feel free to comment on the blog posts, art or editing.