Showing posts with label criticism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label criticism. Show all posts

Thursday, May 8, 2025

On The Green Berets, and John Wayne as Reactionary. Louis Shalako.











Louis Shalako


Here’s a funny thing. John Wayne wasn’t acting. In the early days, he might have had to do some acting in order to become the role. Those were all westerns, and Mr. Wayne could ride a horse, he was from Texas. He enjoyed the outdoors, shooting, hunting and fishing for example. 

(If you ever see me on a horse, you can assume I am not only acting, but way out of my depth.)

It wasn’t a great leap of the imagination, when it came time for him to get in front of the camera. The man didn’t even have to change his shirt or pull on a set of cowboy boots. He was already dressed for the role, when he came walking in that front door. Once who John Wayne was, or became what he believed himself to be, once all of that had been defined, all he had to do was keep on keeping on. After that, all he ever did was to play himself.

Writers were tasked with writing a film, (or screenplay), and that much is true. It is also true that almost anyone might have been cast in some of the roles. The actual premise went a little something like this: what would John Wayne do, when confronted with a given situation. What would John Wayne do if he was a senior officer in the Green Berets. There is no acting here. The political and social commentary is all John Wayne, ladies and gentlemen.

A sort of cultural anachronism, the rah-rah patriotism, the Battle Hymn of the Republic kind of film. I reckon everyone in this film was a Republican, even David Janssen.

A film so bad, it's taken me three days to watch it and I actually like crummy old war movies. The Green Berets is a reactionary movie in the fullest sense. John Wayne was trying to project, or to correct a narrative, this at a time when there were student protests, journalists were investigating, that 24-hour news cycle was just coming on, with film literally flown home for the evening broadcasts. (It took about 48 hours to get a film back to the U.S., priority jet flight.) Congressional and Senate committees were inquiring into the conduct of the war. There was bad news all around from Vietnam. You can bet the pollsters were all over it, and politicians listen to the pollsters, don't they. Even the Viet Cong are Republicans in this film.

It's interesting to see Batjac Productions stock actors regurgitated all through the film. Most of them appeared in many a western produced by Batjac. I'm recognizing face after face. It strikes me that your politics had better be correct or you would never work with Mr. Wayne. He simply wouldn’t have you, no matter how suitable or how good you were in a role. That is, in a word, reactionary.

Over the years, many people have blamed micromanagement from the White House for the U.S. defeat. They’ve had fifty years to figure it out, and yet they still haven’t. Some have blamed Communist infiltration, paid demonstrators, (sound familiar?), professional agitators poisoning the minds of students. Some have blamed the news media for the loss of the war. The news media do not have the power to deploy battalions and institute military plans. Some have blamed General Westmoreland for fighting WW II tactics and strategies in unsuitable terrain and social conditions. Some have blamed Robert MacNamara’s focus on body counts, and some have blamed the corruption and incompetence of South Vietnamese political and military leadership. (Also, a capitalist leadership. But we'll try and ignore that. - ed.) It is also true that a strategic bombing offensive isn't very effective against mud, hills and villages of straw huts, and when the major city and port of the enemy are off limits. 

Very few acknowledge the fact that the war was unwinnable before the U.S. ever got involved. 

The Japanese found that out. The French found that out at Dien Bien Phu. The Chinese have found out, both before, and since, that time period. The lessons were there, they were simply ignored. The lessons are still being ignored.

Ho Chi Minh, a key figure in Vietnamese history, attended the 1919 Versailles Peace Conference in Paris, hoping to seek recognition and support for Vietnamese independence from France. He used the platform to deliver an eight-point petition demanding equal rights and autonomy for Indochina. While he hoped to meet with President Woodrow Wilson, he was ultimately unsuccessful and did not secure the support he sought. (AI overview)

One of the more obvious lessons here. A motivated and ideologically-pure entity will prevail over a decadent and hedonistic entity by virtue of discipline and energy.

Communism was scary shit to the America of the time, and that still holds true today, even though true communism has never been successful. The idea of Marxist-Leninist communism is essentially dead. In that sense, it is the word that holds power and not the reality. This is why so many Americans foam at the mouth at the word socialism.

More from our AI overview:

However, at the time of the Versailles Conference, Hồ Chí Minh was committed to a socialist program. While the conference was ongoing, Nguyễn Ái Quốc was already delivering speeches on the prospects of Bolshevism in Asia and was attempting to persuade French socialists to join Lenin's Communist International.

That is also one of the lessons, and it is also why when reactionaries talk about socialism, they also point to places like Venezuela, China, North Korea. Which may have communist or socialist overtones, but are anything but benevolent to the common people.

They are authoritarian dictatorships, extractive, exploitative, and anything but benign. They are not only corrupt, from the top down in the usual fashion, but also incompetent. They are, in fact, the antithesis of socialism.

***

Nietzsche believed that a man's belief about himself is not a fixed entity, but rather a product of his own creation and interpretation of his existence. He argued that individuals must "become who they are" by cultivating their unique virtues and facing the challenges of life head-on. This process involves self-discovery, self-reflection, and a constant striving for self-mastery. (AI overview)

In a sense, John Wayne was self-invented. Whether we agree with his political or social views or not, that was one hell of an achievement, ladies and gentlemen. I'm in the process of doing something very much like that myself.

It's crazy enough, it might just work.

Others have done it before.



END


The Green Berets. A John Wayne film and more.

John Wayne.

Batjac Productions. (Wiki)

Battle Hymn of the Republic, sung, ironically enough, by the Mormon Tabernacle Choir.

Louis Shalako has books and stories on Google Play.

See his works on Fine Art America.


Thank you for reading.

 

 

 







Saturday, September 9, 2023

Moonraker: a Technical Analysis of the 1979 James Bond Film. Louis Shalako.

The structure is typical for the era, shiny and mostly bullshit...

 




Louis Shalako




In the James Bond film Moonraker, in the opening scenes, a space shuttle is stolen off the back of a Boeing 747. 

You may remember the scene, where a couple of guys sneak out of the broom closet or the pantry or somewhere. They fire up the engines, and take off, with the blast destroying the plane. 

(Yeah, piss-poor security, eh. - ed).

The empty weight of the shuttle would be about 165,000 lbs. It was transported on the back of a 747. That part is real. It really did happen, sort of. There would be no payload, obviously, what is really interesting is that there would be no fuel either. That is because the engines were fueled from the massive central tank system, additional boost coming from the solid-fuel rockets strapped onto that. So the entire premise of the film is bogus from scene one. Further criticisms are sort of redundant, and yet I plan on doing it anyways...

(That's our Louis. - ed.)

I could mention that the aircraft crashes in northern Canada and Drax’s shuttle base is in South America, or at least somewhere with some really big fucking snakes.

You simply can’t get there from here. There is no reason for the onboard tank, which would be located behind the cargo bay and ahead of the engines, to have any fuel at all in such a scenario. 

It is true, that the shuttle was glide-tested, and landings were conducted in order to gain the knowledge necessary to fly and land the thing. That was one reason for the whole 747-rig, that and transport between assembly and launch pad. Landing gear might get a lot of assistance from gravity, but they do have to contend with aerodynamic forces, and you want them to fully deploy and to lock into position. This implies some sort of powered system. You want to see three green lights on your dashboard. Two greens and one red would be real bad news—

It’s not rocket science, ladies and gentlemen—

It's not rocket science, Mister Bond...

#snork

You don’t use reaction control in the atmosphere, not when you have rudder, ailerons, elevators, all of which could run on battery-powered electric servo-motors. You don’t use reaction control to run the pumps and compressors for the hydraulic landing gear system, for example. All you need are batteries, in fact otherwise powerless aircraft have been saved by deploying a wind-turbine into the slipstream in order to generate minimal electrical power. With electrical power, temperature is less of a consideration, you don’t want an air tank or a fluid, hydraulic system to freeze up just when you need it most. And if you want to trickle a little bit of heat to any such system, you still need a battery.

Drax's shuttles do have external tanks, and solid boosters, and their cargo bays are full of people. They did that much research, they checked that many facts. Once that central tank is dropped, minimal fuel is aboard the shuttle, that is for maneuvering and re-entry, otherwise you're kind of stuck up there. The big problem there, is that the blast from all engines popping off at once in an enclosed space, would surely destroy the shuttles, all of them, as they were built as lightly as possible…also, there is no way in hell Bond and Doctor Goodhead could ever outrun the blast, directed as it is down, in an enclosed space, with ducts and tubes and all of that. Even so, Bond and Doctor Goodhead seem to be blasting along in Drax's personal Shuttle Five all right, trying to shoot down the pods that are to dispense the bug-juice, thereby destroying the human race…right? Those lasers run on electrical power from one source or another...

Oh, James...

As you know, in the actual shuttle flights, the solid boosters dropped off first, the shuttle riding the tank up a little higher, but of course it's the bottom part of that equation that takes most of the energy—going from zero miles per hour, at the bottom of that gravity well. The force of gravity varies inversely to (or with), the square of the distance, as we recall from our elementary school exercises, ladies and gentlemen. The higher you get, the less the force of gravity upon your 'body', organic, celestial, or man-made machine. The force of gravity would be an accelerating (or decelerating) curve, the further you get away from Earth.

Bearing in mind Drax's space station has a 'radar jamming system', even if it worked, (and not just putting out a strong signal in the sky, over a large band of frequencies, which could hardly be missed), such a large object would be visible due to simple reflected sunlight. You can see the ISS, (International Space Station) on any clear night, (even when it's dark out), and you can even track it online so you know where and when to look. The only thing more predictable than an orbit, is a geosynchronous orbit, if I may submit. That's because it ain't actually going anywheres, it just sits there in one spot all the fucking time. It's not really clear what Drax's station is doing from the available information, probably nothing if you ask me...

The ISS is a lot smaller than Drax's space station. I won't worry you with the artificial gravity, although with that central area allegedly 'horizontal', and the station rotating in the vertical axis, there are so many technical problems with this film that it isn't even funny. It has been said the series became, over time, a parody of itself. As for the actual structure, this thing is hardly designed for stealth.

The best part of this film is when Bond comes in the front door of the glass works in Venice. That girl—yeah, that one right there, that one interests me. She makes a lot of other women look like boys...

As for an amphibious gondola, coming up out of the water and zooming off through the square by what is presumably St. Mark's Cathedral, that one is just plain ridiculous. Everyone likes ‘Q’, the scenes where they ride across the pampas to the theme from The Magnificent Seven are cute. Just cute. Fight scenes in a glass museum, tossing a guy out through an antique clock, well, they’re always fun and satisfying for the audience.

Everyone loves me...'Q'.

***

I took my girlfriend to this film when it first came out. It was a thing, these were popular films and the truth is, we had a good time. These films are, first and foremost, entertainment.

I’ve mentioned fight scenes on top of cable-cars in a previous blogpost.

Stealing a parachute in mid-fall is of course hopeless…boat chases and runaway aircraft appear in other Bond films, in fact they reprise themselves surprisingly often. There are hang-gliding scenes in this film and in Live and Let Die, then there is the gyrocopter in You Only Live Twice, the jet-pack scene in Goldfinger and the car-plane in The Man With the Golden Gun. The battle in space, forces conveniently colour-coded, reprises the underwater scene in Thunderball and the ninjas-dropping-from-above of You Only Live Twice.

Right?

There were reasons why this series sort of fell away for a while and in fact it was Timothy Dalton that sort of breathed new life into it. It was still bad, in many ways, but it was at least watchable. Timothy Dalton is not gay, which puts his performance in The Lion in Winter, (Peter O'Toole, Katherine Hepburn, Anthony Hopkins), into its proper perspective and all the more impressive because of that...

 

#technical_stuff

 

END

 

Images. Stolen from the internet.

Louis has books and stories available from Amazon.

See his works on Fine Art America.

Check out this story on the #superdough blog.

 

Thank you for reading.

 

 

 


Monday, September 4, 2023

Alistair Maclean's Where Eagles Dare: a Series of Plot-Holes Flying in Close Formation. Louis Shalako.

Heidi, Major Smith, and Mary Ellison in Where Eagles Dare.




Louis Shalako





Alistair Maclean’s Where Eagles Dare is one of the most popular war films of all time. I bought the book at about the age of eighteen. I liked Alistair Maclean so much, that I bought every book of his that I could find. Over the course of time I owned, and have read many of them, (some of them, many, many times), but by no means all of them.

Every so often, I search the internet looking for crummy old movies, which I like very much. I watch this film several times a year, as well as Ice Station Zebra, The Guns of Navarone, Force 10 from Navarone, When Eight Bells Toll, Bear Island, Puppet on a Chain and of course Breakheart Pass. There are some I simply can’t find. One or two, I can find them but the thing is unwatchable, either due to poor reproduction or poor sound.

Some of these old films were taken off a television screen with a camcorder, dubbed more than once, and it really shows sometimes. Also, volume is often an issue, if you’re going to upload videos to the internet, for crying out loud, turn up the fucking volume already…we can turn it down ourselves if we have to.

River of Death is just plain bad, Donald Pleasance, Michael Dudikoff and Robert Vaughn, Herbert Lom and L.Q. Jones are unable to save it by mere presence alone. One pretty girl cannot save a bad film, ladies and gentlemen. (Full cast.)

***

As entertaining as the film is, Where Eagles Dare is riddled with plot holes and just plain inconsistencies.

Hopefully the reader understands that as a student of writing, one can learn a lot by attention to detail—a good lesson for any writer or director, then there is a bit of logical analysis, and then there is good old fact-checking.

For example, in the opening scene, a Junkers JU-52 aircraft simply does not have the range to fly from the U.K. to southern Germany, and return. The range is quoted at 620 miles, top speed of 165 mph. Cruising speed would be less. The town of Werfen is a real town, it’s in Austria, part of Germany after the Anschluss, not far from the Bavarian border. At its maximum speed, even if it had the range, you would be flying in enemy airspace for hours and hours at a time. You would have to do it twice in what looks like about twenty-four hours, for they parachute and land in darkness, hang out all day, leave in the night and take off in at least some daylight…

The action takes place before D-Day, in fact the fake General Carnaby was supposedly flying to Crete to consult with his Russian counterparts prior to the invasion, where some sort of coordination, or maybe just notification, would be in order.

Only problem there, is that Crete was not liberated until 1945—a simple statement of fact, which can be checked.

Also, assuming you just stole a JU-52 off a nearby airbase, every fighter and anti-aircraft battery in Western Europe would be looking for that plane, which would be lumbering along at 130-mph or whatever. Your best bet would be to head for Switzerland, and if the plane was simply stolen, there would be no way for Colonel Turner to be there in the final, climactic scene. And why send the Colonel along in the first place? It would be so much wiser just to arrest him while he’s still in England, still at headquarters, where armed people abound, hell, they might even have a cell to put him in. This is the significance of the scene where the Admiral asks, 'do you have it?' as Colonel Turner and the others have been under suspicion for some time. One wonders why they didn't just arrest him and sweat him a little, but then there would be no film...right? At this point, the other enemy agents are expendable and nothing but a hindrance to any escape plan...

Google. 2,292.9 miles.

It gets better. The fake general was aboard a de Havilland Mosquito, which might have had the range for a one-way trip to Crete in the long-range reconnaissance version which was developed for the Pacific Campaign, and they did range all over Europe. The bomber version has a quoted range of 1,300 miles. Launched from Suffolk, the distance to Crete is over 2,200 miles. Riddled with English bullet holes, as Major Smith (Richard Burton) says, it crash landed, conveniently enough, ten miles away at a German military airfield. No mention is ever made of what happened to the British pilot of that aircraft, one supposes the prisoners were kept separated in what is standard operating procedure.

Standard operating procedure is virtually ignored all through this film.

Okay, upon arrival by parachute, which would have made more sense if it had been from a Stirling bomber, or the Halifax, both of which were used by airborne forces, Sergeant Harrod is found dead. Assuming all of the others were wearing the same, standard issue boots, even so, it would have been possible to simply follow the tracks, for surely Harrod himself didn’t make too many. Seven people come down scattered. To rendezvous with the gear, seven (or six, to be accurate) sets of tracks converge on a point. Searching for the missing Harrod, six sets of tracks go out from that point in some kind of search pattern. Bearing this in mind, watching the film, we can see any number of tracks, one of the challenges of filming on location in wintertime. Yet Smith makes no attempt to follow any tracks. Yet he knows that Harrod has been murdered, taking into account all the bullshit about marks on the neck and stuff. Presumably the mission comes first. Presumably, they already have their suspicions of at least some of this crew already...in the film, the next to go is Jock, which tends to indicate his innocence.

Ingrid Pitt as Heidi.

As for Lieutenant Schaffer, (Clint Eastwood in one of many iconic roles), we know he's innocent, as Smith points out he's an American, and brought in for just this purpose...he's untainted by Britishness or something. Right.

Bloody well right...

(Louis is getting ahead of the plot here. - ed.)

The party proceeds to a small farmhouse in a high alpine meadow, seasonal accommodation fairly common in that part of the world. And he says, that while grabbing the radio, he has forgotten the codebooks. He has to go back, theoretically, for he actually did take them, this after sending the party back for the equipment. He goes out to the barn, where he meets the Mary Ellison character, after ordering the others not to leave the building. Yet it seems odd that not one of them ever needs to go the outhouse, for there is no likelihood of indoor plumbing in such a dwelling…

What is interesting is that never, at any time in the film, do they use code. They use call-signs, broadcasting in the clear, “Broadsword calling Danny Boy,” and all that sort of a thing.

Codes are codes. There is such a thing as a spoken code, or word-substitution text codes, but code books were basically a series of numbers, meant to be sent by something akin to Morse code—a series of dots and dashes sent by clicking a momentary switch.

***

We’ll skip over the clear, physical impossibility of leaping off the top of a cable-car and then half-running up a snow-covered roof. It’s a dramatic scene, full of suspense and dread, and yet there is just no way you could do it. Why would you, when you could just get some forged documents and ride up inside the cable-car, just like everybody else.

The whole premise of the film is bogus. A lie can be just as revealing as the truth, and this guy is supposed to allow himself to be tortured, according to Smith, into revealing false plans for the Second Front. I also find it difficult to believe that anyone, including a second-rate actor, would volunteer or allow themselves to be inveigled into undertaking such a mission. No one has that much faith, no one—as operations go, this one is awful hairy. Think about it: you are under torture. You have fake plans for D-Day. You most emphatically do not have the real plans for D-Day. How far would you push your luck? Right about the point where they're going to slice your pecker off, that's where.

It is true that a successful disinformation campaign was carried out prior to D-Day, much of it involving fake radio traffic, which emanated from the U.K.

Prior to the invasion of Sicily, (see The Man Who Never Was), there was an operation to convince the enemy, Germany and Italy, that the next invasion would be of the Balkans—rather than Sicily.

***

Der Schloss Adler. I bet there's a road, ladies and gentlemen.

Radio rooms. Once inside the castle, Smith and Schaffer take a look, Smith says they must disable the helicopter…Schaffer kills the guy in the Funkraum, (German for radio room), while Smith goes out and finds the helicopter pilot. There is literally a sign on the wall, this is for the audience to know its a radio room. He tells him there is a phone call, directing him to the Funkraum (radio room in German), just around the corner, where Schaffer stabs him. All very well, but the equipment in no way resembles a telephone switchboard. There would be an internal switchboard, connected within the castle. Outside lines would go through a switchboard down the mountain in the village.

I may tend to jump around in this analysis, if one has seen the film, you should be able to keep up, if you’ve never seen the film, then reading this post is essentially useless. There is a lot to cover, and I may not be able to hit every little thing.

Road work. The car accident. One wonders why three prisoners were taken to the castle via the cable car, whereas Smith and Schaffer were taken by car, which leads to the car accident scene. One wonders why their hands were not bound, when Schaffer moves to ‘tie up his shoelaces’, for example. One wonders what kind of road work, in the middle of winter, involves a piddly little cement mixer, or a few boards leaning up against the cliff, or various little racks that just stand there. There are two piles of gravel and some road barricades…after going out of control, the car goes up and over the first gravel pile and then crashes into the next one. Yet somehow, they manage to push the car back far enough, turn the wheel and then send it over the cliff. Now they walk back to town. All of this leads up to the question of where exactly does that road go…??? Presumably the castle. This just brings us back to question of why use the cable car at all. With good forged documents, the odds are, senior officers would have been admitted at the gate, even if they were unexpected. Truth is, they would have been brought in and then checked out very thoroughly. If the road does not go to the castle, just where in the hell were they going. A contradiction, if you will.

Himmler’s brother. When the six survivors arrive in town, stash their packs and enter zum Wilden Hirsh, (German for wild stag or wild hart), Smith informs another German officer that he is Himmler’s brother. This is about as stupid as it gets, ladies and gentlemen. A public figure in his own right, he might have been recognizable to anyone that read a newspaper, especially considering his older brother, but also as well as his employment at Berlin Radio.

Anti-aircraft gun in courtyard. This is more a matter of detail. With thirty or forty-foot curtain walls, the field of fire is severely restricted, and this weapon really should have been put up on the walls, or even outside the building, on a nearby hilltop, overlooking the valuable target it is meant to protect.

S.S. versus Gestapo. I became curious, as I often do. The Gestapo did indeed have a full-dress military style uniform. The average Gestapo in the civilian street really did wear the long, brown leather coats and various civilian attire. The psychology of a Gestapo officer wearing a uniform while surrounded by other military types is pretty obvious, it was meant to show rank, status, and perhaps to be taken seriously when surrounded by senior German officers. As far as that goes, there might not be too much love lost between S.S. and Gestapo, service rivalries being what they are in any army past and present.

***

The so-called proof. This is where the second radio room comes in...once we get to the scene in the great hall, where the assembled guests are comfortably seated around the table, with General Carnaby, soon to be revealed as Corporal Cartright-Jones, once we get past the fact that his hands are not bound, a clear violation of standard procedures, there is the question of so-called proof. This is when Major Smith suggests that the Germans have ‘one of the most powerful radio-telephones in Europe’ and that they contact Wilhelm Wilner in Italy to confirm his identity. One, the operator in the first Funkraum is dead, along with the helicopter pilot. Two, no one has discovered the bodies, and if this is indeed the telephone room, one wonders why no internal phone traffic, in what is purported to be the headquarters of the S.S. or Gestapo in southern Bavaria. How come no off-duty troopers use their privilege, pay the tolls and make a quick call home to the wife and family. But now, we see the need for a second radio room. That guy hasn’t been killed yet, right? And they obviously can't use the phone in the regular fashion. They're using the 'radio telephone', a real thing which actually did exist in WW II, referred to by British types as the r/t in many a book and film. Would it be possible to patch a phone line into the inputs of a radio set? Presumably, yes. The castle is described as the headquarters of the German Secret Service in Bavaria, yet seems to be populated with uniformed officers of the S.S. and Gestapo, and down below is a training camp for what are likely mountain troops...details, details.

#details

As far as the actual proof, it is of course ludicrous and no self-respecting senior officer would ever take it at face value. The very fact that two unknown officers come tramping down the stairs and into the room, unannounced, would have been something of a dead giveaway. Also, telling the enemy anything is bad practice. Yet the Germans bring in three spies to impress Carnaby, and Smith admits he’s been feeding bad info to Willi Wilner in Italy.

The poster.

There may be more, (maybe even plenty more), but you get the flavour of it. I have fantasized on occasion, of trying to find every Alistair Maclean book, perhaps in the thrift stores or buying them on Amazon. River of Death might be better enjoyed as a book than as a bad film, for example. I would love to read some of them again, that is for sure, ladies and gentlemen.

Films of this era have good colour, there are no computer generated images. Sets, vehicles, weapons are period, the locations are good, the acting is good, the budget was adequate. The pyrotechnics are good. It’s got a lot going for it, don’t get me wrong. Some guys like the Heidi character, for a couple of pretty obvious reasons. I like the Mary Ure character, but then I’ve always admired a girl that can shoot—that one’s more than just a pretty face.

Fighting on top of a cable-car is just plain nuts, yet the scene is reprised in Moonraker, with Bond and Jaws, and of course Doctor Goodhead—a real bad name, but Ian Fleming was famous for that sort of thing.

The film is fun, full of eye-candy for the war movie buff. In so many respects, it is a very good film and probably one of the best, for war movies fall down so very, very often...that, is a story for another day.

Other than that, you can learn much from almost any film, good or bad, if you have a jaundiced eye and a penchant for writing. One of the reasons I wanted to write in the first place, and this is not a thing to say lightly: because so much of film and television was just bad, ladies and gentlemen. That was true back then, and I reckon it’s still true today.

Notes. What was the German Secret Service. The answer is complicated. Heydrich and Himmler had their own ideas and their own empires to build, but the Abwehr existed until the assassination attempt of July 20, 1944, after which Hitler did away with the Abwehr, and Admiral Canaris and Colonel Oster ended up in concentration camps, ultimately murdered in the most cruel and obscene ways.

See: Sicherhietsdienst.



END


Louis Shalako has ebooks and audiobooks available from Google Play. Some of them are presently free, for example On the Nature of the Gods.

Louis has some artworks on ArtPal.

My First Pho. See this story on the #superdough blog.

 

Thank you for reading.

 

 

 


Sunday, December 15, 2013

On Agatha Christie.

Agatha Christie, DBE. (Wiki.)









by Louis Shalako



I’m the sort of guy who likes to figure things out for myself.

You can’t be writing crime or mystery fiction without ever hearing of Agatha Christie. She wrote seventy-eight mystery novels and five or six Gothic romances under the Mary Westmacott name. She wrote the longest-running play in history, The Mousetrap.

She was made a Dame of the British Empire and has sold something like a billion copies worldwide.

I was about fourteen years old. I was bored, and my mom suggested that I might like to read a book, I guess it was a rainy Saturday or something.

I recall coming out of my room and announcing that I was going to be a mystery writer! So I guess I liked the books just fine back then. In fact, about that age, I decided I was going to be a private detective, the fact that I was reading Erle Stanley Gardner and Brett Halliday, and Rex Stout may have had something to do with it. In some strange way, I got my wish, for having set up a murder in a book, the writer must go on to solve the crime, using those 'little grey cells.'

Nero Wolfe’s leg-man Archie Goodwin could remember a conversation verbatim, and recite it in full to Nero Wolfe later, serving as his eyes and ears because Wolfe hated to leave his house.

That impressed me as a valuable skill, and at a certain age, you sort of resent it when people remember things wrong. Were they just stupid? Or just covering their backsides, or had they lied, and never had any intention of doing what they said they were going to do? I guess I’ll never know, but kids are impatient creatures and I concluded that the average person was a bit stupid if they couldn’t remember what they said last week, last month, or last year. Archie Goodwin influenced me, it’s fair to say. Enough background, but I figure I’m relatively competent to write a book report or a review.

Is Agatha any good?

When my mother kindly brought a box of twenty old Agatha Christie books around, I finished whatever I was reading and they were close to hand.

The first one kind of put me off. Elephants Can Remember was rather passive. It was rather vague, and yet it involves a crime that occurred twelve years previously. Sure, old people have fuzzy memories, and the one character, a young girl, in one scene, when asked where she was when her parents were killed, said she couldn’t quite recall. In a later scene she said she was in school in Switzerland when it happened. Even so, that book has page after page of dialogue.

I would estimate the book at well over ninety percent, more like ninety-five percent dialogue.

So that one didn’t impress me too much.

The next one I read was The Man in the Brown Suit.

That one restored my faith in Agatha Christie, but of course the action didn’t happen twelve years in the past. 

Elephants got a three-star rating on Goodreads and the next one five stars, as I recall.

I’m working on the fifth one now, The Murder of the Blue Train. It’s a good book.

The trouble with Agatha Christie books of course, is that they’ve been in print for a long time.

Publishers bought the license, changed the title, and slapped a new cover on old books. If you bought one brand-new at the bookstore, there was a very good chance that you’d get halfway into the story, sit up and say, “Shit! I’ve read this book before.”

We can only blame the publisher for that.

One thing I noticed, in a Fontana edition, was that they used single quotation marks for dialogue.

When someone quoted from history, a literary figure or an aphorism, within dialogue, the typesetters had little choice but to use double quotation marks. To me, that’s bass-ackwards, although it really doesn’t detract from the overall story.

I’m just reading analytically.

In the first five books, two of them have involved wigs. As soon as I read that, I sat up and said, “Aha!”

I knew that was a clue, right? My suspicious were aroused. In the last book I sort of had it figured out, sort of, but she threw yet another twist in and fooled me. If I was investigating that crime for myself, I probably would have worried away at it and just kept going until I caught the killer, but in a novel, all the reader has to go on is what’s inside the pages of the book. Real life is different.

In fact, murder mysteries are not that common in real life, one only has to watch The First 48 Hours a few times to realize that most homicides are anything but planned, anything but well thought out and anything but clever—they are crimes of impulse, passion, and as often as not people get killed over a fifty-dollar drug debt, some disparaging words, or an argument over a girlfriend.

They are anything but sophisticated. That being said, the mystery genre has its tropes.

Agatha Christie is masterful enough (or Madameful enough?) that she always managed to bring up the important clues and at the same time misdirecting enough that so far I have not really known who did the crime until the author revealed it to the reader.

Speaking of tropes, the wig, the Hollywood makeup, the rubber mask glued on with ‘spirit gum’ are all too familiar. That wouldn’t work for me and it probably wouldn’t work for the average killer. I’m six-foot five inches tall, and the odds of me successfully posing as a woman for any length of time are negligible. I would say that’s true of most males, although a pale, slender, relatively short male might pull it off—as long as he doesn’t have a heavy beard, and a five-o’clock shadow, and remembers to sit down to pee…

How many times have we seen it?

The killer is run to ground and then someone grabs them under the chin and pulls off the tightly-fitting mask and of course it’s always the least suspicious person, diabolically clever, and the detective would have to be some sort of genius to get that far.

But also, when you think of Murder She Wrote or even The Rockford Files, it’s pretty obvious that mystery writers, book, film, TV, are often borrowing from the past. They do it pretty heavily and without shame. I would say there have been perhaps one too many writerly crimes—authors, publishers, agents, all very clever and willing to kill to get what they want. Jessica Fletcher, in Murder She Wrote, runs in those circles. She has no need to go out and solve drug crimes in the least glamorous part of town. In that sense, murder mysteries are still escapist fantasies, using established tropes and full of the usual stereotypes.

Another thing is the preponderance of what Christie calls the ‘mentally-disturbed.’ James Patterson has made a good career of portraying the seriously mentally ill perpetrator, his only variation being the serial nature of the crimes, the ticking clock in the background, (which builds tension and suspense) and the setting in a major city. The books are more thriller than mystery or detective story. His detective Alex Cross, the one with all the kids, still follows the stereotype, in that the detective has to have a ‘tic.’ Hercule Poirot had his green eyes, the egg-shaped head and the luxuriant mustaches. I think Mrs, Ariadne Oliver, another character invented by Christie, also a crime writer, has come to hate her own Finnish detective, God knows if he’s got a peg-leg or an eye-patch, but that is just the way things were done—and they still are, as often as not, in modern detective fiction. It is a formulaic genre and woe betide the author who forgets that the readers have certain expectations.

One of my criticisms of an Agatha Christie novel, and I think it is a valid one, was where a small group of people are at dinner and one dies of poisoning. The number of suspects is so limited that in my opinion no self-respecting murderer would ever take such a chance! And yet she pulled that one off too.

That is one small part of Agatha Christie’s legacy. She influenced more than one generation of writers.

I have no doubt of that at all, and she certainly influenced me.

When I go to write my fourth mystery novel in a few months, I will have a lot to think about.

Hopefully the reader will wish me luck on that one.

But we are following in a great tradition. If you don’t like something as a reader or a writer—and I’m not fond of Patterson for some reason—you have the right to do it any way you like. If you can pull it off, then you may have accomplished something of literary value.

If nothing else, I have a hell of a lot of fun writing them.


END

If the reader is interested, my original crime novella ‘The Handbag’s Tale’ is free from iTunes and a number of online bookstores.

This series was inspired as much by Georges Simenon’s Maigret series as anything else, as I wanted a distinctly French feel, a certain noir kind of literature, but there are distinct parallels with Hercule Poirot; perhaps more so with Maigret, although I've only read a couple of those.


The Art of Murder. (Barnes & Noble.)