Showing posts with label film. Show all posts
Showing posts with label film. Show all posts

Thursday, May 8, 2025

On The Green Berets, and John Wayne as Reactionary. Louis Shalako.











Louis Shalako


Here’s a funny thing. John Wayne wasn’t acting. In the early days, he might have had to do some acting in order to become the role. Those were all westerns, and Mr. Wayne could ride a horse, he was from Texas. He enjoyed the outdoors, shooting, hunting and fishing for example. 

(If you ever see me on a horse, you can assume I am not only acting, but way out of my depth.)

It wasn’t a great leap of the imagination, when it came time for him to get in front of the camera. The man didn’t even have to change his shirt or pull on a set of cowboy boots. He was already dressed for the role, when he came walking in that front door. Once who John Wayne was, or became what he believed himself to be, once all of that had been defined, all he had to do was keep on keeping on. After that, all he ever did was to play himself.

Writers were tasked with writing a film, (or screenplay), and that much is true. It is also true that almost anyone might have been cast in some of the roles. The actual premise went a little something like this: what would John Wayne do, when confronted with a given situation. What would John Wayne do if he was a senior officer in the Green Berets. There is no acting here. The political and social commentary is all John Wayne, ladies and gentlemen.

A sort of cultural anachronism, the rah-rah patriotism, the Battle Hymn of the Republic kind of film. I reckon everyone in this film was a Republican, even David Janssen.

A film so bad, it's taken me three days to watch it and I actually like crummy old war movies. The Green Berets is a reactionary movie in the fullest sense. John Wayne was trying to project, or to correct a narrative, this at a time when there were student protests, journalists were investigating, that 24-hour news cycle was just coming on, with film literally flown home for the evening broadcasts. (It took about 48 hours to get a film back to the U.S., priority jet flight.) Congressional and Senate committees were inquiring into the conduct of the war. There was bad news all around from Vietnam. You can bet the pollsters were all over it, and politicians listen to the pollsters, don't they. Even the Viet Cong are Republicans in this film.

It's interesting to see Batjac Productions stock actors regurgitated all through the film. Most of them appeared in many a western produced by Batjac. I'm recognizing face after face. It strikes me that your politics had better be correct or you would never work with Mr. Wayne. He simply wouldn’t have you, no matter how suitable or how good you were in a role. That is, in a word, reactionary.

Over the years, many people have blamed micromanagement from the White House for the U.S. defeat. They’ve had fifty years to figure it out, and yet they still haven’t. Some have blamed Communist infiltration, paid demonstrators, (sound familiar?), professional agitators poisoning the minds of students. Some have blamed the news media for the loss of the war. The news media do not have the power to deploy battalions and institute military plans. Some have blamed General Westmoreland for fighting WW II tactics and strategies in unsuitable terrain and social conditions. Some have blamed Robert MacNamara’s focus on body counts, and some have blamed the corruption and incompetence of South Vietnamese political and military leadership. (Also, a capitalist leadership. But we'll try and ignore that. - ed.) It is also true that a strategic bombing offensive isn't very effective against mud, hills and villages of straw huts, and when the major city and port of the enemy are off limits. 

Very few acknowledge the fact that the war was unwinnable before the U.S. ever got involved. 

The Japanese found that out. The French found that out at Dien Bien Phu. The Chinese have found out, both before, and since, that time period. The lessons were there, they were simply ignored. The lessons are still being ignored.

Ho Chi Minh, a key figure in Vietnamese history, attended the 1919 Versailles Peace Conference in Paris, hoping to seek recognition and support for Vietnamese independence from France. He used the platform to deliver an eight-point petition demanding equal rights and autonomy for Indochina. While he hoped to meet with President Woodrow Wilson, he was ultimately unsuccessful and did not secure the support he sought. (AI overview)

One of the more obvious lessons here. A motivated and ideologically-pure entity will prevail over a decadent and hedonistic entity by virtue of discipline and energy.

Communism was scary shit to the America of the time, and that still holds true today, even though true communism has never been successful. The idea of Marxist-Leninist communism is essentially dead. In that sense, it is the word that holds power and not the reality. This is why so many Americans foam at the mouth at the word socialism.

More from our AI overview:

However, at the time of the Versailles Conference, Hồ Chí Minh was committed to a socialist program. While the conference was ongoing, Nguyễn Ái Quốc was already delivering speeches on the prospects of Bolshevism in Asia and was attempting to persuade French socialists to join Lenin's Communist International.

That is also one of the lessons, and it is also why when reactionaries talk about socialism, they also point to places like Venezuela, China, North Korea. Which may have communist or socialist overtones, but are anything but benevolent to the common people.

They are authoritarian dictatorships, extractive, exploitative, and anything but benign. They are not only corrupt, from the top down in the usual fashion, but also incompetent. They are, in fact, the antithesis of socialism.

***

Nietzsche believed that a man's belief about himself is not a fixed entity, but rather a product of his own creation and interpretation of his existence. He argued that individuals must "become who they are" by cultivating their unique virtues and facing the challenges of life head-on. This process involves self-discovery, self-reflection, and a constant striving for self-mastery. (AI overview)

In a sense, John Wayne was self-invented. Whether we agree with his political or social views or not, that was one hell of an achievement, ladies and gentlemen. I'm in the process of doing something very much like that myself.

It's crazy enough, it might just work.

Others have done it before.



END


The Green Berets. A John Wayne film and more.

John Wayne.

Batjac Productions. (Wiki)

Battle Hymn of the Republic, sung, ironically enough, by the Mormon Tabernacle Choir.

Louis Shalako has books and stories on Google Play.

See his works on Fine Art America.


Thank you for reading.

 

 

 







Monday, September 4, 2023

Alistair Maclean's Where Eagles Dare: a Series of Plot-Holes Flying in Close Formation. Louis Shalako.

Heidi, Major Smith, and Mary Ellison in Where Eagles Dare.




Louis Shalako





Alistair Maclean’s Where Eagles Dare is one of the most popular war films of all time. I bought the book at about the age of eighteen. I liked Alistair Maclean so much, that I bought every book of his that I could find. Over the course of time I owned, and have read many of them, (some of them, many, many times), but by no means all of them.

Every so often, I search the internet looking for crummy old movies, which I like very much. I watch this film several times a year, as well as Ice Station Zebra, The Guns of Navarone, Force 10 from Navarone, When Eight Bells Toll, Bear Island, Puppet on a Chain and of course Breakheart Pass. There are some I simply can’t find. One or two, I can find them but the thing is unwatchable, either due to poor reproduction or poor sound.

Some of these old films were taken off a television screen with a camcorder, dubbed more than once, and it really shows sometimes. Also, volume is often an issue, if you’re going to upload videos to the internet, for crying out loud, turn up the fucking volume already…we can turn it down ourselves if we have to.

River of Death is just plain bad, Donald Pleasance, Michael Dudikoff and Robert Vaughn, Herbert Lom and L.Q. Jones are unable to save it by mere presence alone. One pretty girl cannot save a bad film, ladies and gentlemen. (Full cast.)

***

As entertaining as the film is, Where Eagles Dare is riddled with plot holes and just plain inconsistencies.

Hopefully the reader understands that as a student of writing, one can learn a lot by attention to detail—a good lesson for any writer or director, then there is a bit of logical analysis, and then there is good old fact-checking.

For example, in the opening scene, a Junkers JU-52 aircraft simply does not have the range to fly from the U.K. to southern Germany, and return. The range is quoted at 620 miles, top speed of 165 mph. Cruising speed would be less. The town of Werfen is a real town, it’s in Austria, part of Germany after the Anschluss, not far from the Bavarian border. At its maximum speed, even if it had the range, you would be flying in enemy airspace for hours and hours at a time. You would have to do it twice in what looks like about twenty-four hours, for they parachute and land in darkness, hang out all day, leave in the night and take off in at least some daylight…

The action takes place before D-Day, in fact the fake General Carnaby was supposedly flying to Crete to consult with his Russian counterparts prior to the invasion, where some sort of coordination, or maybe just notification, would be in order.

Only problem there, is that Crete was not liberated until 1945—a simple statement of fact, which can be checked.

Also, assuming you just stole a JU-52 off a nearby airbase, every fighter and anti-aircraft battery in Western Europe would be looking for that plane, which would be lumbering along at 130-mph or whatever. Your best bet would be to head for Switzerland, and if the plane was simply stolen, there would be no way for Colonel Turner to be there in the final, climactic scene. And why send the Colonel along in the first place? It would be so much wiser just to arrest him while he’s still in England, still at headquarters, where armed people abound, hell, they might even have a cell to put him in. This is the significance of the scene where the Admiral asks, 'do you have it?' as Colonel Turner and the others have been under suspicion for some time. One wonders why they didn't just arrest him and sweat him a little, but then there would be no film...right? At this point, the other enemy agents are expendable and nothing but a hindrance to any escape plan...

Google. 2,292.9 miles.

It gets better. The fake general was aboard a de Havilland Mosquito, which might have had the range for a one-way trip to Crete in the long-range reconnaissance version which was developed for the Pacific Campaign, and they did range all over Europe. The bomber version has a quoted range of 1,300 miles. Launched from Suffolk, the distance to Crete is over 2,200 miles. Riddled with English bullet holes, as Major Smith (Richard Burton) says, it crash landed, conveniently enough, ten miles away at a German military airfield. No mention is ever made of what happened to the British pilot of that aircraft, one supposes the prisoners were kept separated in what is standard operating procedure.

Standard operating procedure is virtually ignored all through this film.

Okay, upon arrival by parachute, which would have made more sense if it had been from a Stirling bomber, or the Halifax, both of which were used by airborne forces, Sergeant Harrod is found dead. Assuming all of the others were wearing the same, standard issue boots, even so, it would have been possible to simply follow the tracks, for surely Harrod himself didn’t make too many. Seven people come down scattered. To rendezvous with the gear, seven (or six, to be accurate) sets of tracks converge on a point. Searching for the missing Harrod, six sets of tracks go out from that point in some kind of search pattern. Bearing this in mind, watching the film, we can see any number of tracks, one of the challenges of filming on location in wintertime. Yet Smith makes no attempt to follow any tracks. Yet he knows that Harrod has been murdered, taking into account all the bullshit about marks on the neck and stuff. Presumably the mission comes first. Presumably, they already have their suspicions of at least some of this crew already...in the film, the next to go is Jock, which tends to indicate his innocence.

Ingrid Pitt as Heidi.

As for Lieutenant Schaffer, (Clint Eastwood in one of many iconic roles), we know he's innocent, as Smith points out he's an American, and brought in for just this purpose...he's untainted by Britishness or something. Right.

Bloody well right...

(Louis is getting ahead of the plot here. - ed.)

The party proceeds to a small farmhouse in a high alpine meadow, seasonal accommodation fairly common in that part of the world. And he says, that while grabbing the radio, he has forgotten the codebooks. He has to go back, theoretically, for he actually did take them, this after sending the party back for the equipment. He goes out to the barn, where he meets the Mary Ellison character, after ordering the others not to leave the building. Yet it seems odd that not one of them ever needs to go the outhouse, for there is no likelihood of indoor plumbing in such a dwelling…

What is interesting is that never, at any time in the film, do they use code. They use call-signs, broadcasting in the clear, “Broadsword calling Danny Boy,” and all that sort of a thing.

Codes are codes. There is such a thing as a spoken code, or word-substitution text codes, but code books were basically a series of numbers, meant to be sent by something akin to Morse code—a series of dots and dashes sent by clicking a momentary switch.

***

We’ll skip over the clear, physical impossibility of leaping off the top of a cable-car and then half-running up a snow-covered roof. It’s a dramatic scene, full of suspense and dread, and yet there is just no way you could do it. Why would you, when you could just get some forged documents and ride up inside the cable-car, just like everybody else.

The whole premise of the film is bogus. A lie can be just as revealing as the truth, and this guy is supposed to allow himself to be tortured, according to Smith, into revealing false plans for the Second Front. I also find it difficult to believe that anyone, including a second-rate actor, would volunteer or allow themselves to be inveigled into undertaking such a mission. No one has that much faith, no one—as operations go, this one is awful hairy. Think about it: you are under torture. You have fake plans for D-Day. You most emphatically do not have the real plans for D-Day. How far would you push your luck? Right about the point where they're going to slice your pecker off, that's where.

It is true that a successful disinformation campaign was carried out prior to D-Day, much of it involving fake radio traffic, which emanated from the U.K.

Prior to the invasion of Sicily, (see The Man Who Never Was), there was an operation to convince the enemy, Germany and Italy, that the next invasion would be of the Balkans—rather than Sicily.

***

Der Schloss Adler. I bet there's a road, ladies and gentlemen.

Radio rooms. Once inside the castle, Smith and Schaffer take a look, Smith says they must disable the helicopter…Schaffer kills the guy in the Funkraum, (German for radio room), while Smith goes out and finds the helicopter pilot. There is literally a sign on the wall, this is for the audience to know its a radio room. He tells him there is a phone call, directing him to the Funkraum (radio room in German), just around the corner, where Schaffer stabs him. All very well, but the equipment in no way resembles a telephone switchboard. There would be an internal switchboard, connected within the castle. Outside lines would go through a switchboard down the mountain in the village.

I may tend to jump around in this analysis, if one has seen the film, you should be able to keep up, if you’ve never seen the film, then reading this post is essentially useless. There is a lot to cover, and I may not be able to hit every little thing.

Road work. The car accident. One wonders why three prisoners were taken to the castle via the cable car, whereas Smith and Schaffer were taken by car, which leads to the car accident scene. One wonders why their hands were not bound, when Schaffer moves to ‘tie up his shoelaces’, for example. One wonders what kind of road work, in the middle of winter, involves a piddly little cement mixer, or a few boards leaning up against the cliff, or various little racks that just stand there. There are two piles of gravel and some road barricades…after going out of control, the car goes up and over the first gravel pile and then crashes into the next one. Yet somehow, they manage to push the car back far enough, turn the wheel and then send it over the cliff. Now they walk back to town. All of this leads up to the question of where exactly does that road go…??? Presumably the castle. This just brings us back to question of why use the cable car at all. With good forged documents, the odds are, senior officers would have been admitted at the gate, even if they were unexpected. Truth is, they would have been brought in and then checked out very thoroughly. If the road does not go to the castle, just where in the hell were they going. A contradiction, if you will.

Himmler’s brother. When the six survivors arrive in town, stash their packs and enter zum Wilden Hirsh, (German for wild stag or wild hart), Smith informs another German officer that he is Himmler’s brother. This is about as stupid as it gets, ladies and gentlemen. A public figure in his own right, he might have been recognizable to anyone that read a newspaper, especially considering his older brother, but also as well as his employment at Berlin Radio.

Anti-aircraft gun in courtyard. This is more a matter of detail. With thirty or forty-foot curtain walls, the field of fire is severely restricted, and this weapon really should have been put up on the walls, or even outside the building, on a nearby hilltop, overlooking the valuable target it is meant to protect.

S.S. versus Gestapo. I became curious, as I often do. The Gestapo did indeed have a full-dress military style uniform. The average Gestapo in the civilian street really did wear the long, brown leather coats and various civilian attire. The psychology of a Gestapo officer wearing a uniform while surrounded by other military types is pretty obvious, it was meant to show rank, status, and perhaps to be taken seriously when surrounded by senior German officers. As far as that goes, there might not be too much love lost between S.S. and Gestapo, service rivalries being what they are in any army past and present.

***

The so-called proof. This is where the second radio room comes in...once we get to the scene in the great hall, where the assembled guests are comfortably seated around the table, with General Carnaby, soon to be revealed as Corporal Cartright-Jones, once we get past the fact that his hands are not bound, a clear violation of standard procedures, there is the question of so-called proof. This is when Major Smith suggests that the Germans have ‘one of the most powerful radio-telephones in Europe’ and that they contact Wilhelm Wilner in Italy to confirm his identity. One, the operator in the first Funkraum is dead, along with the helicopter pilot. Two, no one has discovered the bodies, and if this is indeed the telephone room, one wonders why no internal phone traffic, in what is purported to be the headquarters of the S.S. or Gestapo in southern Bavaria. How come no off-duty troopers use their privilege, pay the tolls and make a quick call home to the wife and family. But now, we see the need for a second radio room. That guy hasn’t been killed yet, right? And they obviously can't use the phone in the regular fashion. They're using the 'radio telephone', a real thing which actually did exist in WW II, referred to by British types as the r/t in many a book and film. Would it be possible to patch a phone line into the inputs of a radio set? Presumably, yes. The castle is described as the headquarters of the German Secret Service in Bavaria, yet seems to be populated with uniformed officers of the S.S. and Gestapo, and down below is a training camp for what are likely mountain troops...details, details.

#details

As far as the actual proof, it is of course ludicrous and no self-respecting senior officer would ever take it at face value. The very fact that two unknown officers come tramping down the stairs and into the room, unannounced, would have been something of a dead giveaway. Also, telling the enemy anything is bad practice. Yet the Germans bring in three spies to impress Carnaby, and Smith admits he’s been feeding bad info to Willi Wilner in Italy.

The poster.

There may be more, (maybe even plenty more), but you get the flavour of it. I have fantasized on occasion, of trying to find every Alistair Maclean book, perhaps in the thrift stores or buying them on Amazon. River of Death might be better enjoyed as a book than as a bad film, for example. I would love to read some of them again, that is for sure, ladies and gentlemen.

Films of this era have good colour, there are no computer generated images. Sets, vehicles, weapons are period, the locations are good, the acting is good, the budget was adequate. The pyrotechnics are good. It’s got a lot going for it, don’t get me wrong. Some guys like the Heidi character, for a couple of pretty obvious reasons. I like the Mary Ure character, but then I’ve always admired a girl that can shoot—that one’s more than just a pretty face.

Fighting on top of a cable-car is just plain nuts, yet the scene is reprised in Moonraker, with Bond and Jaws, and of course Doctor Goodhead—a real bad name, but Ian Fleming was famous for that sort of thing.

The film is fun, full of eye-candy for the war movie buff. In so many respects, it is a very good film and probably one of the best, for war movies fall down so very, very often...that, is a story for another day.

Other than that, you can learn much from almost any film, good or bad, if you have a jaundiced eye and a penchant for writing. One of the reasons I wanted to write in the first place, and this is not a thing to say lightly: because so much of film and television was just bad, ladies and gentlemen. That was true back then, and I reckon it’s still true today.

Notes. What was the German Secret Service. The answer is complicated. Heydrich and Himmler had their own ideas and their own empires to build, but the Abwehr existed until the assassination attempt of July 20, 1944, after which Hitler did away with the Abwehr, and Admiral Canaris and Colonel Oster ended up in concentration camps, ultimately murdered in the most cruel and obscene ways.

See: Sicherhietsdienst.



END


Louis Shalako has ebooks and audiobooks available from Google Play. Some of them are presently free, for example On the Nature of the Gods.

Louis has some artworks on ArtPal.

My First Pho. See this story on the #superdough blog.

 

Thank you for reading.

 

 

 


Sunday, December 9, 2012

The A-Team.




My brother has a big TV and basic satellite service. Every so often there’s a free movie channel preview. I watch a bit of boob-tube at his place.

I just saw the last half of ‘The A-Team’ the other day. If you remember the original series with George Peppard as Hannibal Smith and Mr. T as BA, the boys expended about a million rounds of nine-millimetre ball ammo in every episode without ever hitting anyone. It was all right for the times and the intended audience, but lame enough looking back on it now.

That’s the show where it really wasn’t sufficient to wreck a car or even to blow it up, it had to in all cases come up off the ground and do a slow roll in mid-air before exploding and finally coming back down again in order to be completely satisfactory.

The movie is more of the same, only better. It has a huge budget. It’s fast paced. It doesn’t let up for a minute, for to do so would beg questions. Audiences today don’t like questions. They want it all up front. In the modern film, they finally bring themselves to actually kill someone, which is probably good.

But the stunts are clearly impossible, and real human beings would have been killed ten times over while undergoing similar things. Just as an example, when a couple of hundred shipping containers fell off the deck of a ship, most normal beings would have been killed. Too many things were physically impossible for me to really enjoy the film—this is the difference between the early Sean Connery Bond movies and what the franchise eventually became.

Yet I’m not saying this is a bad movie. What it is, is a very, very good movie—judging by the standards of the day, and the expectations of fans of the summer thriller-blockbuster genre. It stands up well against its fellows. It reminded me in some ways of the Fast and the Furious V, the one where Vin Diesel and Dwayne Johnson, The Rock drag shipping containers on cables at ninety miles per hour in cars that are clearly not structurally capable of taking such loads, through a major city, while destroying official pursuit vehicles by the myriad. I mean, seriously, if you want realism, verisimilitude, go elsewhere. A couple of great actors, but it’s action that counts, non-stop action that sweeps an audience along right up until the last minute. All of these films have plots, by the way. Plot is the least important element, it is merely a starting point for the effects people.

Realism and verisimilitude are not a big consideration for this audience which probably consists of ten year-olds and their long-suffering parents. However, in writing fiction, it’s not all up-front. People have to suck up the coded bits of information, and make the movie happen inside of their own heads.

Fiction requires that willing suspension of disbelief for it to work at all. To try and write like that is beyond my own belief system...for this writer, I can’t use that sort of thing in a book. I need to believe in the thing, and for me, this requires some kind of verisimilitude. It requires grounding in reality, or I am uncomfortable in the writing of it. I also think it wouldn't come across in a text form...unless it was written in comic-book form, using simple little words a ten year-old might get, but an adult would simply toss the book.

My new novel is a thriller, and it pays attention to certain expectations of the genre. But I think because of the times we live in, while my ending might be tame by summer movie standards, (no big chases, no big explosions, no super-hero like escapades,) it’s a bit of a stretch for my comfort zone. I’m wondering if I can make it work at all, yet unless I come up with some other ending for the book, I’m going with what I’ve got and hope for the best. This book was originally inspired by Jack Higgins, (The Eagle Has Landed,) and Alistair Maclean in some odd way. 'The Way to Dusty Death' is one inspiration for my book, call it an influence if you will. Critics say Alistair’s work varied in consistency over the years, but I’ve always wanted to write in that sort of WW II/action/adventure/espionage genre and I guess this is my first shot at actually doing it. It's a way of indulging myself. Those aren't special-effects films, are they?

It's based on historical facts, and is plot-based and character-based without relying on superhuman stunts or unusual states of physical fitness. That is a limitation, no question about it.

But the other thing to remember is the times we live in, the sort of other titles it will have to compete with in its genre, and the sort of expectations that readers will have when they first crack it open.

In that sense, it’s a bit of a crap-shoot no matter how we look at it.

(Photo: original image by Bryan Snelson/Herrick, Wiki Commons 2.0 Attribution/Generic. The car is a 1938 Alpha Romeo Mille Miglia Spyder.)